The human mind has devised a wide variety of business entitiesthat is, of forms of doing business. The mind of the IRS has kept up, devising tax rules for these entities. Often, however, these rules involve taxing the owner of the entity, and not the entity itself.
There are basically two federal tax systems for businesses:
A sole proprietorshipsuch as John Doe Plumbing or Marcus Welby, M.D.is also considered a pass through entity even though no "organization" may be involved.
The first major considerationin this case, a tax considerationin choosing the form of doing business is whether to choose an entity (such as a C corp.) that has two levels of tax on income or a pass through entity that has only one level (directly on the owners).
Losses are directly deductible by pass through owners while C corp. losses are deducted only against profits (past or future) and dont pass through to owners.
The major business consideration (as opposed to tax consideration) in choosing the form of business is limitation of liability, that is, to protect your assets from the claims of business creditors. State law grants limitation of liability to corporations (C and S corps), LLCs, and partners in certain forms of partnership. Liability for corporations and LLCs is generally limited to your actual or promised investment in the business.
S and C Corps
The S corp (so named from a chapter of the tax code) is a tax device created by federal law in 1958. It is a regular corporation with regular limited liability under state law, whose owners elect pass through status for federal tax purposes. That status requires compliance with a number of often constricting rules but, with some exceptions, complying corporations escape federal corporate tax. As regular business corporations under state law, they may be taxed under state tax law as regular corporations, or in some other way. Corporations whose owners dont choose to make the federal S corp. electionthat choose to be taxed as corporationsare called C corps (after another chapter of the tax code).
Ordinary partnerships, called "general partnerships," do not have limited liability under state law.
Limited partnerships limit liability for some partners but not others. A limited partnership has both general partners (who manage the business) and limited partners (who in essence are passive investors). The liability of limited partners is generally limited to their investments. The liability of general partners is theoretically unlimited, but can be limited in practice where the general partner is an entity, such as a corporation, with limited liability. A limited partner who takes on what state law considers "too much" management participation is treated as a general partner, losing limited liability.
Both general and limited partnerships are treated as pass through entities under federal tax law, but there are some relatively minor differences in tax treatment between general and limited partners.
A still more recent development, not yet adopted everywhere, is the limited liability partnership (discussed below) which was designed for professional practices.
Other partnership forms are the giant "publicly traded partnerships" (treated as C corps for tax purposes) and limited liability limited partnerships (adopted in only a few states) which limit the liability of general partners (where two or more) as well as of limited partners.
Limited Liability Companies (LLCs)
LLCs have become the most popular business form for new entities, and many existing entities have converted to this form. They exist in some form in every state. They embody limited liability features of corporations and pass through characteristics of partnerships and S corps, but are more flexible than S corps.
For business law purposes, LLC members may be either passive investors or active investor-managers. Unlike with limited partnerships, active management wont affect limitation of liability. For federal tax purposes, LLCs are treated as partnerships (unless they elect otherwise).
Since 1997, the IRS has allowed business owners a previously unheard-of measure of choice as to how the entity will be federally taxed. It allows you to choose between C corp and pass through treatment (universally called "check-the-box").
A few choices are not allowed. If the entity is incorporated, it must be treated as a corporation (which doesnt preclude an S corp election if otherwise available). Publicly traded partnerships and publicly traded LLCs must be treated as C corps.
All other forms of partnership may be taxed either as C corps or as pass through entities (either as partnerships or, if S corp. status is available and elected, as an S corp.)
An LLC with two or more members may choose to be taxed as a C corp., a partnership or an S corp (if elected). An LLC with a single member (where this is allowed) may choose either to be taxed as a C corp. or an S corp. (if elected) or to have the entity disregarded. In this case, if the LLC is owned by an individual, the individual is taxed directly (and can deduct losses) as with a sole proprietorship.
Typically, partnerships and multimember LLCs choose to be taxed as partnerships while single member LLCs choose to have the entity disregarded. With "check-the-box," the IRS will no longer question your right to combine limited liability with pass through treatment or, if you wish, to waive pass through treatment for an entity otherwise entitled to it (with the exceptions noted above).
Any choice has consequences. For example, if you opted last year for corporate treatment and want partnership treatment this year, youll be treated as liquidating the corporation, and taxed accordingly (discussed below).
Mostbut not allstates that impose corporate taxes follow a taxpayers federal "check-the-box" choice for state tax purposes. This doesnt necessarily mean that the tax treatment will be the same. For example, a state may accept an LLCs election to be taxed as a partnership and still impose an entity level tax on the LLC.
An election to be taxed as a certain type of entity for federal tax purposes does not make it such an entity under state business law.
Let us now consider which form will work best for the way you want to run your business, and capitalize on its profits or startup losses. "Compared to what?" will be a major consideration. Well need to compare the taxable entity (the C corp.) with pass through entities and compare each of the pass-throughs with the others. Well also look at tax consequences of changing from one entity to another.
One major decision is whether to use a C corp. or some form of pass-through C corps are sometimes necessary, from a business standpoint. For example, if interests in the enterprise are to be publicly traded, only the C corps is appropriate.
From a tax standpoint, while C corporations present two levels of tax, the first tax (on the corporation) can be at a rate lower than the tax on the owner and the second tax (on the owner) is usually postponed until the owner receives dividends or other assets from the corporation.
A C corp can minimize corporate tax by paying out all or almost all of its income to owners in the form of compensation and fringe benefits. Assuming these payments are deductible as business expenses, this approximates pass through treatment, since the corporation isnt taxed on what it receives and then deducts; the owner-recipients alone are taxed on this. This arrangement works best in personal service businesses, where full business expense deduction is more likely to be allowed.
To summarize, some businesses may find C corp status necessary for business purposes. But only comparatively rarely will it be a preferable tax choice for a new business.
If you decide on a pass-through entity, which of the several do you choose? Here is a brief discussion of the rules applicable to each.
Limitation of liability gives S corps the edgefor business reasonsover general partnerships, sole proprietorships, limited partnerships (as to limited partners whose partnership activity might expose them to unlimited liability), and LLCs in states that dont allow single member LLCs.
S corps are subject to a number of significant rules and restrictions:
These limits and restrictions will be contrasted, below, with the more liberal tax rules for partnerships and LLCs.
LLCs vs. S Corporations
LLCs and S corps share the same business advantagelimitation of liability. S corps are a bit better understood by the business community because LLCs are new and vary from state to state.
The tax advantages of LLCs, as compared to S corps, are the tax advantages of partnerships. All the points below where LLCs outscore S corps arise because LLCs can choose partnership tax status.
Depending on state law, S corps and LLCs may be taxed at the entity level in states where they do business.
LLCs vs. Partnerships
LLCs, with their limited liability for all members, have the edge on general and limited partnerships from a business standpoint. While the federal tax treatment of partners and LLC members is basically the same, there are occasional special tax rules for limited partners (especially self-employment tax rules).
LLCs vs. Proprietorships
LLCs, with their limited liability, are preferable, where available, for sole proprietors from a business standpoint. Where the sole proprietor so elects, the LLC is ignored and the proprietor is taxed directly under federal tax rules as if no separate entity existed.
Professional practices (such as doctors and lawyers) have a number of options as to their form of business entity.
Professional corporations (P.C.s)
These provide limited liability for general business debts but not for the professionals own malpractice and, in some states, no limited liability for malpractice of fellow practitioners in the firm. They may be C corps or S corps. Unlike many other C corps, a P.C. C corp can use the cash method of accounting.
Most states allow professionals to practice in LLCs, either under a general LLC law or a special Professional Limited Liability Company law (PLLC). In either case, liability is not limited for the professionals own malpractice but, depending on the state, may be limited for the malpractice of other firm members and for other firm debts. These LLCs share the comparative advantages (and minor disadvantages) of other LLCs.
Limited Liability Partnerships (LLPs)
LLPs are general partnerships whose general partners have limited liability. They are designed for professional practices. A partner is liable for his or her own malpractice but not for a partners malpractice or, depending on state law, other acts of partners. Typically they are required by state law to maintain malpractice insurance, and are obliged to pay a per-partner fee to keep their status, but are not subject to entity level tax.
Sole Proprietors and Partners
Many practitioners choose to practice as sole proprietors or partners, rather than in a limited liability entity. They reason that their main exposure to liability is to malpractice claims, and the entity wont protect against claims for their own malpractice (or, in some states, for a partners malpractice). They therefore choose to rely on malpractice insurance (which practitioners in limited liability entities may have too).
Government and Non-Profit Agencies
OTHER PROS AND CONS OF C CORPS
A C corp can be preferable to pass through entities as to fringe benefits. As employees, owner-employees of a C corp qualify for certain employee fringe benefits. On the other hand, self-employed persons (partners, LLC members, sole proprietors, and more-than 2% stockholders in S corps) dont qualify.
Another modest advantage of C corps is that they are less likely to be subject to passive loss deduction limitations. These limit the opportunity to deduct losses from activities the taxpayer doesnt "materially participate" in, against income from investments or other businesses. Typically, limited partners have been the group most subject to passive loss limitations.
Another tax disadvantage of C corp status is its limited ability to report for tax purposes on the cash method of accounting, which generally defers tax as compared to the accrual method.
A qualifying S corp, generally nontaxable, can be subjected to C corp taxation on certain items without losing S status for other items. This happens when a C corp converts to an S corp and carries over appreciated property later sold at a gain. The S corp pays a corporate tax on the gain, which is then taxed to stockholders (reduced by the corporate tax). Because S corps are intended to be operating companies rather than holding companies, this also happens when the S corp has "excessive" passive investment-type income (interest, dividends, and the like, in excess of 25% of gross receipts). Here the excess is subject to corporate tax and is then taxed to stockholders (minus the corporate tax).
Some see S corps as a way to reduce employment taxes. For example, one earning $100,000 in a sole proprietorship might convert to an S corp and take $60,000 in pay and $40,000 in dividends. Income taxes are unchanged by this but, its reasoned, $40,000 now received as dividends escapes employment tax (the $100,000 of self-employment earnings was subject to both old-age and Medicare tax up to $90,000 (for 2005) and Medicare tax above that).In abuse situations, such as where little or no wages were paid, IRS has treated the dividends as pay subject to employment taxes on the owner-employees and on the S corp employer. But in cases where substantial wages were paid, along with substantial dividends, IRS had not objected.
The many advantages of LLCs, for both business and tax reasons, have encouraged many business owners to convert, or consider converting, to the LLC form. But other changes of entity may suit particular situationsfor example, general partnership to LLP (for business reasons) or C corp to S corp (for tax reasons). For tax purposes, a change of entity via a check-the-box decision is treated for tax purposes as an actual change of the entity (whatever may happen under state business law).
Here, briefly and in broad outline, is what happens for federal tax purposes when entity status is changed (or treated as changed under-check-the-box). How these apply in your own situation must be reviewed in depth with a tax/business advisor.
|© Copyright 2003 FSO Technologies, Inc. All rights reserved.|